State, Ex Rel. v. Bd. of Edn.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The single question involved in this case is whether an action in mandamus is a chancery case, and hence appealable to the Court of Appeals within the provisions of Section 6, Article IV, of the Ohio Constitution, that:
"The Courts of Appeals shall have original jurisdiction inquo warranto, mandamus, habeas corpus, prohibition andprocedendo, and appellate jurisdiction in the trial of chancery cases * * *."
Granting that the action in mandamus, as instituted, conformed to the requirements of Section 12224, General Code, the action has to constitute a chancery case in order that the appeal may…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Riggs v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Heine v. Levee CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Smith v. Bourbon CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- State, ex rel. Beard v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Woods v. HydeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Habe v. City of South EuclidOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Sneary v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Kay v. Board of ElectionsOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
- State ex rel. Brockler v. O'MalleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State ex rel. Katz v. WalterOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.