Legal Opinion

Tuley v. City of Logansport

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, C. J.

Action by the appellant against the appellee. Complaint in five paragraphs. Demurrer to each for want of sufficient facts sustained, and exception. Judgment for defendant.

The demurrer exaggerates the number of paragraphs, for it is addressed severally to each paragraph, numbered from one to seven inclusive. Perhaps, however, there may have been two more paragraphs in the complaint, which were abandoned and therefore not sent up here.

We take the following statement of the substance of the different paragraphs from the brief of counsel for the appellant:

“In substance, the first paragraph states…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jewett v. TalbottIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mott v. State ex rel. KlitzkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Flora v. SachsIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Noble v. A. T. S. F. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  4. Noble v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  5. Pennsylvania Co. v. WentzOhio Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API