Legal Opinion

Tingley v. Times-Mirror Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1904No. L.A. No. 1278PublishedCited by 26 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Action for libel. Defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of this state, with its residence and principal place of business in the city of Los Angeles. The action was brought in the superior court of San Diego County, the residence of plaintiff, and it is alleged in the complaint that the defendant “printed, published, and circulated in the county of San Diego numerous copies of the paper containing said article, and circulated many thousand copies of the paper containing said article in other portions of the state of California.”

Defendant moved to change the place of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brady v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Miller & Lux v. Kern County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Lewis v. S. Pac. Coast R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. Forman v. Mississippi Publishers Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Julian v. Kansas City Star Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  5. Mohn v. TingleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API