Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mercado

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 2019No. 1444 EDA 2016PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpinion By Panella, J.

The Commonwealth appeals from the order of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, affirming the order of the Philadelphia Municipal Court, which granted the motion to suppress evidence that Appellee, Malik Mercado was found to be driving under the influence ("DUI") of a controlled substance, marijuana, when stopped by Philadelphia police at a roadblock checkpoint. 1 After careful review, we conclude that the police substantially complied with the T arbert / Blouse 2 guidelines adopted by our Supreme Court to establish the constitutionality of a DUI roadblock. Specifically, the selection of a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. TarbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. BlouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. WorthySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Com. v. Camejo, F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  2. Com. v. Wright, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API