Legal Opinion

Lemansky v. Charlton Water & Sewer Commission

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided December 12, 2005No. 041107APublished

1Opinion of the Court

Ostrach, Stephen, J.

Kathleen Lemansky and Bonnie Wolanaki each own property in Charlton. Each requests the Court order the defendant Charlton Water and Sewer Commission (“Commission”)1 to permit them to connect their property with the Charlton public sewer system. For the reasons stated below, plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment are denied and the cross motions made by the defendants are allowed.

Factual Analysis

As is to be expected when the parties have filed cross motions for summary judgment under Mass.R.Civ.P. 56, the relevant facts are largely undisputed. The following discussion…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
  3. Selectmen of Topsfield v. State Racing CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Borden, Inc. v. Commissioner of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. American Family Life Assurance Co. v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API