Spitz v. Municipal Court of City of Phoenix
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
We granted this petition for special action because it is a matter of state-wide importance and because there was not equal, plain, speedy and adequate remedy by appeal. Rule 1, Rules of Procedure for Special Actions, 17A A.R.S.
We must answer the following questions:
1. Is the sale of alcoholic beverages to a person under the age of 19 a misdemeanor in violation of A.R.S. § 4-244(9), a crime requiring guilty knowledge?
2. Is a person charged with a violation of A.R.S. § 4-244(9) entitled to a trial by jury?
3. Did the city magistrate act in excess of his jurisdiction in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Goldman v. KautzArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. CutshawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Brannigan v. RaybuckArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Derendal v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State Ex Rel. McDougall v. StrohsonArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JenningsArizona Supreme Court · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.