Legal Opinion

United States v. Pena

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 17, 2009No. 08-1407PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAHL, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Ronald Pena appeals both his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime. His primary contentions are that his conviction rested on improperly admitted fingerprint evidence and that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of either charge. After a careful review, we reject Pena’s claims and affirm the district court.

I. Facts and Procedural Background

Because Pena challenges the sufficiency of the evidence brought against him, we recite…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. United States v. StrakerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Mario Ruvalcaba-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. State v. Ronald KnipferWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. GamboraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API