Legal Opinion

Harbison v. Shirley

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 23, 1908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Wapello . District Court. — HoN. D. M. ANDERSON, Judge. Action on a bond of indemnity against assessment of the mulct tax. Judgment for plaintiff, and the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

On March 30', 1903, the plaintiff leased to the defendants certain premises to be used as a cigar store and a restaurant. The term of this lease was for six months, with the privilege to the second party to renew the same for an additional year. In September,. 1903, the lease was extended by indorsement on the back thereof to March 1, 1904, at an increased rental of $5 per month. The plaintiff exacted from the defendants a bond in the penal sum of $500, conditioned, in substance, that the defendants should engage in no unlawful business upon the premises, and that the plaintiff should be held…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tracy v. . TalmageNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n v. MasonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Webber v. DonnellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Chamberlin v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. Musco v. TorelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  3. White v. HoldenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917
  4. Silvers v. FloydSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. BurkeTennessee Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API