Legal Opinion

Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n v. Mason

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 23, 1890PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the municipal court of St. Paul, refusing a new trial after a dismissal ordered at the trial. The action was to recover a balance of $122 for goods sold and delivered.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This action was brought to recover a balance claimed to be due plaintiff (a corporation) for and on account of bottled beer sold to the defendant. The answer alleged that at the time of the sale defendant, as plaintiff well knew, was the keeper of a house óf *319prostitution; that plaintiff sold the beer expressly for use and dispensation in and for carrying on and maintaining said house; and that when sold and delivered it was agreed between plaintiff and defendant that the beer was to be paid for out of the profits accruing to the latter from her unlawful occupation. On the trial, defendant…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Hanauer v. DoaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Wright v. HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Gaylord v. SoragenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859
  5. Michael v. BaconSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Frankel v. HillierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Douglas A. Kelley v. Gus BoosalisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  4. Northwest Amusement Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Mitchell v. BranhamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API