Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Rohr, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 23, 2023No. 3:20-cv-00574Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NATHANIEL MORGAN and MICHAEL Case No.: 3:20-cv-00574-GPC-AHG BEVAN, individually and on behalf of 12 ORDER RESOLVING JOINT others similarly situated, MOTION REGARDING MOTIONS 13 Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL 14 v. [ECF No. 145] 15 ROHR, INC., et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion, Opposition to Compel Responses to 19 Defendant’s Requests for Admission, Set One, Special Interrogatories, Set One. ECF No. 20 145. The Joint Motion concerns Defendants’ request, pursuant to Rules 33 and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Asea, Inc. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a Corporation, and Harbor Belt Line, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Thomas v. CateDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Diederich v. Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. GoldstoneDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.