Legal Opinion

Haynes v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 30, 2003No. CR 02-1087PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Appellant James K. Haynes was convicted of raping and burglarizing a ninety-four-year-old woman in Fort Smith; he was sentenced to life imprisonment on the rape conviction, and forty years on the burglary. On appeal, he argues that there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions, and that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress DNA evidence.

For his first point on appeal, Haynes argues that there was no direct evidence that he committed the crimes for which he was convicted. He insists that the evidence arrayed against him was purely…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Upton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  4. Boone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Chism v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hampton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Hoyle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Polston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. C.J.M. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  5. C.J.M. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API