Wippman v. Rowe
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRUCKER, Judge.
Appellants, Arthur and Edith Wippman, brought this suit seeking specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, or damages in the alternative. Appellees, Thelma Rowe and the VY-73C Ranch Corporation, counterclaimed for rescission. After a bench trial, the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, holding for appellees on both the complaint and the counterclaim. From the judgment of the trial court, appellants appeal.
Appellants raise four issues on appeal. They first contend that the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Estate of LymanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Diamos v. HirschArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Pleasant v. Arizona Storage & Distributing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Dover Copper Mining Co. v. DoengesArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- In Re Estate of LymanWashington Supreme Court · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Thomas v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local 395 Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Hatco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Hueg v. Sunburst Farms (Glendale) Mutual Water & Agricultural Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Avemco Insurance Co. v. Northern Colorado Air Charter, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Myers v. Western Realty & Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.