Legal Opinion
Panasci v. Panasci
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 18, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The trial court erred in denying plaintiffs repeated requests to set valuation dates for the marital assets. Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (4) (b) provides: "As soon as practicable after a matrimonial action has been commenced, the court shall set the date or dates the parties shall use for the valuation of each asset.” The failure to set valuation dates contributed to the court’s inability to reconcile the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- DeCabrera v. Cabrera-RoseteNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Greenwald v. GreenwaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Sclafani v. SclafaniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Hutchings v. HutchingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Kallins v. KallinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grunfeld v. GrunfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- LaBarre v. LaBarreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Martusewicz v. MartusewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Elmore v. ElmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Johnson v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000