Legal Opinion
Hutchings v. Hutchings
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1989No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: As a general rule, the value of the marital residence should be fixed as of the time of *972trial (see, Rosenberg v Rosenberg, 145 AD2d 916, 918, lv denied 74 NY2d 603; Wegman v Wegman, 123 AD2d 220, 230-237). In the subject case, more than two years elapsed from commencement of the action to the time of trial, and the court did not provide any reason for its selection of the valuation date as the date of commencement of the action. We conclude that the court improvidently…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wegman v. WegmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Rosenberg v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boardman v. BoardmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Panasci v. PanasciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Roehmholdt v. RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Ferrel v. FerrelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Kinloch v. KinlochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.