Legal Opinion

Abercrombie v. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 12, 1987No. 86-2493PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANION, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs, Manley Abercrombie, Richard Calloway, Richard Eckel, Donald E. Hed-rick, and E. Weston Sloan (the directors) are directors of the Rushville (Indiana) National Bank (Bank). The directors filed a complaint in the Southern District of Indiana seeking to enjoin the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (Comptroller) from imposing civil money penalties (CMP’s) on them pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1818(i)(2)(i). The district court denied the directors relief, holding that it had no jurisdiction to enjoin the Comptroller’s actions. Abercrombie v. Office of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Lockerty v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Cary v. CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  5. Breen v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zipp v. Geske & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Abercrombie v. Office Of The Comptroller Of The CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Doral Bank v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
  4. Glenn A. Zipp, Regional Director of the Thirty-Third Region of the National Labor Relations Board and National Labor Relations Board, Plaintiffs-Cross-Defendants-Appellees v. Geske & Sons, Incorporated, Defendant-Cross-Plaintiff-Appellant v. William B. Gould, Iv, Individually, and as Chairman of the National Labor Relations Board, James M. Stephens, Individually, and as a Member of the National Labor Relations Board, Dennis M. Devaney, Individually, and as a Member of the National Labor Relations Board, Cross-Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API