Legal Opinion

American Federation of Government Employees v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 29, 2002No. 00-0936(RMU)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

URBINA, District Judge.

Denying The Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; and Granting the Intervenor-Defen-dants’ Motion for Summary Judgment

I. INTRODUCTION

This Fifth Amendment due process case comes before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). In a two-count amended complaint, the American Federation of Government Employees, the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 2263 (“AFGE”), Rose Reed (“Reed”), and Inez Marquez (“Marquez”)…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Federation of Government Employees v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  2. Marshall v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  3. McDonald v. KempthorneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Amer Fed Govt Empl v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  5. Pearson v. CHUGACH GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API