Legal Opinion

West v. Johnson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The appellant assigns as error that the court should have granted his motion for a directed verdict on the grounds that as matter of law the defendant was free from negligence and the plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence and claims that judgment should have been entered for the defendant. He claims further that if judgment should not have been so entered, the verdict as reduced by the court is in excess of the lowest amount which the jury might properly have awarded under the evidence and that the court erred in giving the plaintiff option to take judgment in excess of such smallest…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ryan v. La Crosse City Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Muska v. ApelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Wills v. Ashland Light, Power & Street Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Feyrer v. DurbrowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Morice v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jolitz v. FintchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Meissner v. PapasDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API