Legal Opinion
Spada v. Pauley
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 18, 1986No. Docket 70902PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtH. R. Gage, J.
Plaintiff, Gregory Spada, a minor, is the child of defendant Janise Pauley. Defendant Gary Pauley is plaintiff’s alleged father. Plaintiff, by his next friend, appeals as of right from a circuit court order granting defendant Gary Pauley’s motion for accelerated judgment, GCR 1963, 116. The circuit court ruled that plaintiff could not maintain an action to determine his parentage separate from that allowed under the Paternity Act and subject to the six-year limitation period of the Paternity Act, MCL 722.714(b); MSA 25.494(b).
Plaintiff was born on February 7, 1970. Defendants were…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gomez v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mills v. HabluetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pickett v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Serafin v. SerafinMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- R___ v. R___Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Washington v. Sinai Hosp. of Greater DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- G.E.B. v. S.R.W.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Department of Revenue v. JarvenpaaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Johnson v. HunterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- S.O.V. v. People ex rel. M.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.