Legal Opinion

United States v. Rafael Herrera

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1991No. 90-3196PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Rafael Herrera raises three issues on appeal: (1) did the United States breach the plea agreement when it informed the probation office of the quantities of drugs involved in the case beyond those incorporated into the amended superceding indictment; (2) did the district court err in relying upon information in the pre-sentence report given by an informant who Herrera asserts is unreliable; (3) did the district court make the required finding of fact under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D) or err in the application of Federal Sentencing Guidelines §§ lB1.3(a)(l),…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Williams v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. David Wayne Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Michael Lee HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Steven W. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. United States v. Ira Silverman (90-3205) Morris G. Woodard (90-5816) and Gary Caton (90-5733/91-6506)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Frank E. ReadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. Mayes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  4. United States v. Marie Antoinette Jackson-RandolphCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. PhibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API