Legal Opinion

Laurel Point Associates v. Susquehanna Township Zoning Hearing Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 28, 2005PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Laurel Point Associates (Laurel Point) appeals from the December 14, 2004, order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County (trial court), which affirmed the decision of the Susquehanna Township (Township) Zoning Hearing Board (ZHB) to deny Laurel Point’s application for a validity variance. We also affirm.

*798Laurel Point owns a four-plus acre tract of unimproved land (Property) located on the south side of Linglestown Road in the Township. (ZHB’s Findings of Fact, Nos. 1, 2.) The Property is zoned R-l, low density residential, which does not permit commercial office…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Hertzberg v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Boundary Drive Associates v. Shrewsbury Township Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Allegheny West Civic Council, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Hopewell Township Board of Supervisors v. GollaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Plumstead Twp. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Oxford Corp. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Nowicki v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Wilson v. Plumstead Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Hunt v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API