Knoll v. Klatt
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
Attorney McCusker, attorney for respondents, was awarded the sum of $1,000, plus dis bursements, for his services, and the appellant, Attorney Rasmussen, was awarded $1,795.64.
No objection is made by respondents or their attorney to the fees set by the county judge, even though the fee under the contract with Rasmussen was limited to one quarter in the event of settlement without suit. Here the amount withheld for attorneys’ fees was one third of the settlement figure of $8,500. Accordingly, we are not confronted with any question other than the propriety of the allocation of the fees. No…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tonn v. ReuterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Will of Gudde v. FastingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Goldman v. Home Mutual Insurance CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Estate of MarotzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by16 opinions
- Standard Theatres, Inc. v. State, Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Herro, McAndrews & Porter, S. C. v. GerhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Tesch v. TeschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Sohn v. BrockingtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Hagans, Brown & Gibbs v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.