Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Home Mutual Insurance Companies

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1964PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The principal issue is, Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ?

The rules for testing a complaint upon demurrer on this ground, so often stated they need no citation, are: (1) Facts alleged are assumed to be true; (2) the complaint is to be liberally construed and given the benefit of every reasonable inference; and (3) if the complaint states any cause of action the demurrer must be overruled.

This complaint suggests two possible causes of action, one for attorney’s fees under statutory lien sec. 256.36, and the other for damages for interference with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Herron v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. E. L. Husting Co. v. Coca Cola Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Young v. LynchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Field v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Marks v. StrubleDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
  2. Herman v. Prudence Mutual Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Kenseth v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  4. Wurtzinger v. JacobsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Hagans, Brown & Gibbs v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API