United States v. Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Suit by the United States against the Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Company and others to restrain the continuance of certain alleged conspiracies and agreements in restraint of interstate commerce in sanitary enameled iron ware. On motion of the Colwell Lead Company and others to compel their codefendants, Max Goebel and certain others, to answer questions.
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, District Judge.
This is a motion by defendants Col-well Lead Company, Jesse T. Duryea, and Bert O. Tilden to compel codefendants Max Goebel, Lloyd G. McCrum, Howard T. Gates. Francis J. Torrance, and Theodore Ahrens to answer certain questions. The motion is made in a suit in equity, instituted at Baltimore July 21, 1910, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland, and brought under section 4 of the Sherman antitrust act, to restrain the continuance of certain alleged conspiracies and agreements in restraint of interstate trade and commerce in sanitary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Blease v. GarlingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. LochrenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Industrial & Mining Guaranty Co. v. Electrical Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Miller Music Corporation v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- H. Wagner & Adler Co. v. MaliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- E. H. Rohde Leather Co. v. Duncan & Sons, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1926
- Ex Parte OdomTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Mathieson Alkali Works v. Arnold, Hoffman & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1929