Industrial & Mining Guaranty Co. v. Electrical Supply Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Northern District of Ohio. In Equity. Bill by the Electrical Supply Company against the Put in-Bay Waterworks, Light & Railway Company, James K. Til-lotson, the Industrial & Mining Guaranty Company, John P. Car-ro thers, H. H. Warner, and others to foreclose a lien for materials furnished.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Northern District of Ohio. In Equity. Bill by the Electrical Supply Company against the Put in-Bay Waterworks, Light & Railway Company, James K. Til-lotson, the Industrial & Mining Guaranty Company, John P. Car-ro thers, H. H. Warner, and others to foreclose a lien for materials furnished. Defendant Tillotson filed a cross bill against the complainant and the other defendants, and procured a temporary injunction. A motion by the Industrial & Mining Guaranty Company to dissolve the injunction was overruled, and…
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, District Judge,
(after stating tlie facts.)1 1. The appellant insists that as the temporary injunction was granted by the district judge September 10, 1892, at the-June term, under the provisions of section 719 of the Revised Statutes of the United States it could not “continue longer than to the circuit court next ensuing, unless so ordered by the circuit court;” that the next term was the December term, 1892, at which no order was made by the circuit court continuing the injunction, and therefore it became inoperative. This contention is founded on- a misconception of the powers of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Dows v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Insurance Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Buzard v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Co. v. Goshen Sweeper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Pittsburg Equitable Meter Co. v. CaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1911
- Cleveland, C. & S. Ry. Co. v. Knickerbocker Trust Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1898
- McDowell v. KurtzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.