Commonwealth v. Biancardi
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
In Commonwealth v. Mutina, 366 Mass. 810 (1975), this court announced that thereafter “where the defense of insanity [lack of criminal responsibility] is fairly raised, the defendant, on his timely request, is entitled to an *252instruction regarding the consequences of a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity.” Id. at 823 n.12. In this case, there was evidence of the defendant’s lack of criminal responsibility, and the defendant made a timely request for an instruction concerning the consequences of a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity. The judge, however, declined to give the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McHoulMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Commonwealth v. MutinaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. TorresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. CallahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. GrenierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. VickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- State of Iowa v. Mark Daryl BeckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Commonwealth v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Commonwealth v. MorganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.