Legal Opinion
Ford v. Astrue
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 2, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2009-1243PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
Plaintiff James Ford was deemed disabled for purposes of the Social Security Act and approved for assistance in January 2006. His benefits were significantly cut by the Social Security Administration soon thereafter, and he promptly disputed these reductions. Due to an administrative error on the part of the Agency, it did not act on Plaintiffs appeal until he filed a pro se suit in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in May 2009, which was subsequently removed to this Court. The Agency then reviewed its decision to limit…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beattie v. BarnhartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Barbour v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Blackman v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Cosby v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Jones v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.