Obermoller v. Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
The trial court denied the application of appellants Larry and Connie Obermoller for a temporary injunction to halt the foreclosure sale of their farm. Appellants argue that the trial court abused its discretion and that they should be allowed to set aside their homestead for a separate sale. Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal on the grounds of mootness. We address the merits and affirm.
FACTS
Respondent, the Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul, held a mortgage on certain farm land owned by appellants. On February 22, 1986, respondent published notice of a foreclosure…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barnes v. MacKenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Bud Johnson Construction Co. v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Laue v. Production Credit Ass'n of Blooming PrairieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Moore v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- PARADATA OF MINN. v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. ObermollerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State of Minnesota v. Claude Riley Crockson, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Minch Family LLLP v. Estate of NorbyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011