State v. Arthur
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*625HASELTON, J.
The state appeals a pretrial order granting defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. ORS 138.060(3). The state asserts that the trial court erroneously concluded that the underlying stop was unlawful because ORS 811.335 does not apply to cars making turns at stop signs or stop lights. We agree that the court misconstrued ORS 811.335 and, thus, reverse and remand.
On June 17, 1997, Portland Police Officer Kruger watched as defendant, driving a car, approached a controlled intersection. Defendant traveled well over 200 feet before signaling to make a right-hand turn approximately 10…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BeaOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. MatthewsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ChilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. CroxenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. ArthurCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. CROXENCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009