Legal Opinion

State v. Croxen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 15, 2009No. CRH060425; A135394PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Affirmed. State v. Kelly, 227 Or App 553, 206 P3d 1098, adh’d to as modified on recons, 229 Or App 461, 211 P3d 932 (2009); State v. Arthur, 158 Or App 623, 976 P2d 1146, rev den, 328 Or 666 (1999).

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. State v. ArthurCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CROXENCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009