Legal Opinion

Holland v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided March 12, 2008No. 09-07-101 CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHARLES KREGER, Justice.

A jury convicted Ricko Deshawn Holland of aggravated assault. The trial court sentenced him to ten years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice— Institutional Division and assessed a fine of $10,000. Holland appeals.

Holland contends the trial court committed reversible error by giving the jury a definition of reasonable doubt during the trial court’s opening remarks. After the jury was sworn, but prior to Holland’s plea and before counsels’ opening statements, the court addressed the jurors and provided these instructions:

You were provided a couple of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Hutch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Saxton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Paulson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Ovalle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. Sebastian Nathanial Roys v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2013
  3. Alberto Torres v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2024
  4. Angel Alejandro Cardenas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  5. Christopher Lynn Brightmon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API