Legal Opinion
Beardsley v. Idaho Forest Industries
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided August 25, 1995No. 21408PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILAK, Justice.
This is a worker’s compensation case. Carl Beardsley had a physically demanding job as a millwright. When he was diagnosed with two hernias, he filed a worker’s compensation complaint claiming his condition resulted from lifting at work. The Industrial Commission denied the claim, holding that Beardsley had not sustained his burden of proving his hernias resulted from a work related accident. We affirm.
I
BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURE
Mr. Beardsley began working for Idaho Forest Industries (IFI) in approximately 1974, and for the last ten to twelve years had been the lead millwright.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Soto v. SimplotIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Pomerinke v. Excel Trucking Transport, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
- Roberts v. Kit Manufacturing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
- Koester v. State Ins. FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dallas Clark v. Shari's Management CorpIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Stevens-McAtee v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Crawford v. Department of CorrectionIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Hart v. Kaman Bearing & SupplyIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Charles Hartgrave v. City of Twin Falls and SIFIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.