Legal Opinion

Soto v. Simplot

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1994No. 20537PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Justice.

In this worker’s compensation case, claimant Antonio Soto (Soto) appeals the Industrial Commission’s finding that no permanent impairment exists from his job-related injury. He also appeals the duration of the Industrial Commission’s award of temporary disability benefits. The issue before us is whether the Commission’s findings are supported by substantial and competent evidence. We hold that substantial and competent evidence supports the Commission’s finding of no permanent impairment, but not its finding as to duration of temporary disability.

I

BACKGROUND AND PROCEEDINGS…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Bunker Hill CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Sykes v. C. P. Clare & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Pomerinke v. Excel Trucking Transport, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Poss v. Meeker MacHine ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Roberts v. Kit Manufacturing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Jensen v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Matter of WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Stevens-McAtee v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Boise Orthopedic Clinic v. Idaho State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Jarvis v. Rexburg Nursing CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API