Legal Opinion

Koester v. State Ins. Fund

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1993No. 19610PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Justice.

Debi Koester sought worker’s compensation benefits for two separate injuries: the first was Lyme disease from an alleged tick bite, and the second was a back injury from a fall, both of which she claimed occurred during the course of her employment as a homemaker for the State of Idaho Community Action Program (Action), who carried workers’ compensation insurance through the State Insurance Fund (State Fund). Koester appeals from the Industrial Commission’s order adopting the findings and conclusions made by a Commission referee that State Fund was not liable for the injury…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Neufeld v. Browning Ferris IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Roe v. Boise Grocery CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Steinebach v. Hoff Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dinius v. Loving Care and More, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kessler Ex Rel. Kessler v. Payette CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Roberts v. Kit Manufacturing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Beardsley v. Idaho Forest IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Hart v. Kaman Bearing & SupplyIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API