Mihalcin v. Hocking College, Unpublished Decision (3-20-2000)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
R.C. 2305.19, also known as the "savings statute," enables a plaintiff to re-file an otherwise time-barred action within one year after a dismissal without prejudice. Appellant John D. Mihalcin, II, invoked R.C. 2305.19 to re-file a previously-dismissed complaint. He later dismissed the re-filed complaint voluntarily, without prejudice, nearly two years after the statute of limitations expired. The appellant re-filed the action yet a third time, attempting to invoke the savings statute again. The issue in this case is whether the appellant may use the savings…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Ohio State Board of Pharmacy v. FrantzOhio Supreme Court · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.