Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Berryhill
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 19, 2019No. Civil Action No. 17-11171-NMGPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGorton, J.
Erik Anderson ("Anderson" or "plaintiff") seeks judicial review of the partial denial of his application for disability insurance benefits by Nancy A. Berryhill ("the Commissioner" or "defendant"), the acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("the SSA"). Anderson asserts that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") was erroneous and that he was improperly denied benefits as a result.
Pending before this Court are plaintiff's motion to reverse or remand the Commissioner's decision (Docket No. 24) and defendant's motion to affirm the Commissioner's decision (Docket…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seavey v. Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Samuel C. EVANGELISTA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Edmond P. Lizotte v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Doyle v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Jose E. ARROYO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lynn M. Perry, Claimant v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, DefendantDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
- Perry v. US Social Security Administration, Acting CommissionerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
- Rosemary F. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2026
- Ruben M. v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2020