Legal Opinion
Rosemary F. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, D. Maine
Decided February 4, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00021Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ROSEMARY F., ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) No. 2:25-cv-00021-SDN ) FRANK BISIGNANO, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION The Plaintiff in this Social Security Disability appeal contends that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred by failing to explain why he did not include any mental limitations in his residual functional capacity (RFC) assessment after finding earlier in his decision that the Plaintiff’s mental impairments resulted in mild limitations. See Plaintiff’s Brief (ECF No. 10). I discern no…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Hung NGUYEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Seavey v. Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Wells v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.