Legal Opinion

Cost Management Services, Inc. v. City of Lakewood

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 1, 2012No. Nos. 41509-7-II; 41744-8-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johanson, A.C.J.

¶1 The city of Lakewood appeals a superior court decision that Cost Management Services (CMS) is not obligated to pay a utility tax for business conducted outside of Lakewood. Lakewood claims that the trial court (1) lacked jurisdiction because CMS failed to exhaust administrative remedies, (2) improperly denied Lakewood’s request for a jury trial, (3) erred in issuing a writ of mandamus, and (4) entered erroneous findings of fact and conclusions of law. We affirm because (1) CMS was not required to exhaust administrative remedies when Lakewood did not issue a final order on…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Wilson v. HorsleyWashington Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cost Management Services, Inc. v. City of LakewoodWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. IGI Resources, Inc. v. City of PascoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Cost Management Services, Inc. v. City of LakewoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Cost Mgmt. Servs. v. City of LakewoodWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. IGI Resources Inc. v. City of PascoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API