Legal Opinion

Furnco Construction Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 1989No. Appeal 233 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Narick,

Furnco Construction Company (Employer) appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision that William E. Dorogy (Claimant) was totally disabled due to asbestosis and silicosis contracted during the course of his employment. We affirm.

Claimant was first employed as a salaried foreman by Employer in 1962. The contract for hire was made in Monessen, Pennsylvania. Employer’s home office is in New York, and it has no Pennsylvania office. Claimant’s job as foreman, and later, as a supervisor, required that he travel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Krawchuk v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. City of Williamsport v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Stegner v. Canterbury Coal Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McIlvaine Trucking, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Roman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Murhon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Pfizer, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. General Electric Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API