Roman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BLATT, Senior Judge.
Ernesto Roman (claimant) appeals here from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referee’s decision denying the claimant compensation under Section 301(c)(1) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act)1 because he failed to prove that his injury arose in the course of his employment.
Before this court, the claimant raises two issues. The first is that certain findings of the referee are not supported by substantial evidence. The second is that the referee’s findings do not support the conclusion that the claimant was not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Port Authority v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Investors Diversified Services & Travelers Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Howar) (Hoar)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Aluminum Co. of America v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Stillman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nevin Trucking v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Lenzner Coach Lines v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Holler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Beaver & Casey, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Buczynski v. Industrial Commission of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.