Legal Opinion

Moore v. Township of Kenockee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1889PublishedCited by 25 opinions

■ Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Case for injuries to property by reason of non-repair of a township bridge. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action is brought to recover damages to a traction-engine, caused by breaking through a bridge on one of the highways in defendant township, and was tried before a jury, and plaintiff had verdict and judgment for $500. Defendant brings error.

The injury to the engine occurred on August 11, 1886. The plaintiff on that day was passing over what is called “Benner Bridge ” with the engine, when some of the stringers broke, and the engine fell to the creek, some six or seven feet below. It cost $43.25 to raise it out of the creek, and $142.52 to repair it.

Testimony was also given tending to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Converse v. BlumrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Merkle v. Township of BenningtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Township of Medina v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Stebbins v. Township of KeeneMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Alexander v. City of Big RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. McEvoy v. City of Sault Ste. MarieMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Sayer v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Reynolds v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Corey v. SmalleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API