Legal Opinion
United States v. Samuel Keith Shoels
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 11, 1982No. 81-1748PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Chief Judge.
The appellant, Samuel K. Shoels, appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(b) for unlawfully taking away with the intention of stealing money or other things of value from the Majestic Savings and Loan Association. On appeal he claims that § 2113(b) does not include the crime of obtaining property by false pretenses, thus warranting reversal. In addition he claims several trial errors.
The facts leading up to the appellant’s indictment and conviction are as follows. On July 2, 1980 a man identifying himself as Irving Butler presented a personal check payable to himself…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Larry Leon Chaney v. John N. Brown, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, McAlester OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Peter Brian Cikora v. Richard L. DuggerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Michael Archuleta v. Dareld Kerby, Warden, Central, N.M. Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Curtis Jordan HillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Alfred HintonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.