Michael Archuleta v. Dareld Kerby, Warden, Central, N.M. Correctional Facility
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Michael Archuleta appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The issue on appeal is whether his due process rights were violated by the introduction at his trial of testimony concerning a show-up identification in which he was shown to witnesses while he was handcuffed and seated in a police car and the introduction of a subsequent in-court identification by those witnesses. We conclude that his due process rights were not violated. Therefore, we affirm the district court’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Michael R. Romero v. Robert J. Tansy and Attorney General of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Clarence E. Grubbs v. Robert D. Hannigan Attorney General of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Lonnie Ray WisemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Snow v. SirmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Case v. MondragonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.