Legal Opinion
United States v. Alfred Hinton
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 13, 1983No. 313, Docket 82-1209PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Circuit Judge:
I
The principal issue on this appeal is whether conduct which may constitute larceny by false pretenses is encompassed within 18 U.S.C. § 2113(b) (1976), which provides that “whoever takes and carries away, with intent to steal or purloin, any property or money” belonging to a federally insured bank commits a federal crime. As we held in United States v. Fistel, 460 F.2d 157, 163 (2d Cir.1972), the federal bank robbery statute prohibits a broader range of conduct than common law larceny, and covers all “takings with intent to deprive the owner of permanent use of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Goldblatt, Lynn DavidCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Elizabeth Sanders James SandersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. John WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Myung S. KohCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Wilmer Paradise v. Cci WardenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.