Montalti v. Catanzariti
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCLOSKY, J.
Appellant Assunta Montalti appeals from a summary judgment entered against her and in favor of respondent Luigi V. Catanzariti. She contends “A. The statute of limitations on a cause of action under Civil [sic Penal] Code sections 631 and 637.2 commences when the plaintiff *98knew or should have known of the defendant’s unlawful acts [and] B. The trial court erroneously interpreted one phrase of Ribas v. Clark wherein the Supreme Court was discussing not the statute of limitations but an issue of judicial privilege.”
Ms. Montalti filed suit against Mr. Catanzariti on May 28,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Ribas v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- G.H.I.I. v. MTS, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Slack v. Kanawha County Housing & Redevelopment AuthorityWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
- Kuschner v. Nationwide Credit, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
- In re Yahoo Mail LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Hypertouch, Inc. v. Valueclick, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- County of El Dorado v. Super Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.