Legal Opinion

Perry v. Esch

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1992No. S-89-740PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Defendants, Dennis L. Esch and John Raynor, appeal an order of the district court for Polk County, Nebraska, in a declaratory judgment action filed by plaintiffs-appellees, Kendall Perry and Kellan Perry, brothers. The trial court determined that an “Option To Purchase Real Estate” remained in full force and effect, although plaintiffs had not paid the real estate taxes as required by the contract, and that defendants were “equitably estopped from terminating the option contract of August 1,1987.”

Defendants timely appealed and in this court assign five errors. The first two may be summarized…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chadron Energy Corp. v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Union Insurance v. BaileyNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wheat Belt Public Power District v. BattermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Cadwell v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. In Re Estate of MichelsNebraska Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davenport Ltd. v. 75th & Dodge INebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Properties Investment Group of Mid-America v. Applied Communications, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Double K, Inc. v. Scottsdale InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Noah's Ark Processors v. UniFirst Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Noah's Ark Processors v. UniFirst Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API