Legal Opinion

Riley v. Lake

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 1, 1972No. 43004Published

1Opinion of the Court

203 N.W.2d 331 (1972)

Carolyn M. RILEY, Respondent,

v.

Henry Arthur LAKE et al., Appellants.

No. 43004.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

December 1, 1972.

Reavill, Neimeyer, Johnson, Fredin & Killen and Steven J. Seiler, Duluth, for appellants.

MacDonald & Munger, Palmer, Hood, Crassweller & McCarthy, Duluth, for respondent.

Heard before KNUTSON, C. J., and OTIS, PETERSON, TODD, and MASON, JJ. Reheard en banc.

KNUTSON, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant's motion for amended answers to the interrogatories to the jury or for judgment notwithstanding the verdict of the jury, or for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moore v. KujathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Zelinger v. State Sand & Gravel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Guptill v. RoemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Riley v. LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Martin v. BussertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API