Legal Opinion

Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. Lawall

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 9, 2002No. Nos. 01-16799, 01-16861PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona and its corporate chapter, Planned Parenthood of Central and Northern Arizona, Inc., and David L. Child, M.D., (collectively “Planned Parenthood”) challenge the facial validity of Arizona’s parental consent abortion statute. We must decide whether the current incarnation of the statute’s judicial bypass provision satisfies two constitutionally recognized rights of privacy — the right to make fundamental life decisions and the right to avoid disclosure of personal information. We hold that it does.

The district court denied…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alpha Medical Clinic v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. Hubbs v. AlamaoDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
  3. Planned Parenthood Of Southern Arizona v. Barbara LawallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Rowland v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
  5. Vandecar v. DanielsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API