Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. Neely
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 21, 1997No. 96-17016PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
130 F.3d 400
39 Fed.R.Serv.3d 680, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8802,
97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,271
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA and its Corporate
Chapter, Arizona Women's Clinic, Inc.; Planned Parenthood
of Central and Northern Arizona, Inc.; and Dr. David Rhae,
M.D., and Dr. Maryanna Friederich, M.D., individually and on
behalf of their minor patients, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Stephen D. NEELY, as County Attorney for the County of Pima,
and as representative for all other county attorneys and
other prosecuting attorneys similarly situated throughout
the State of Arizona, including without…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Griffin v. School Bd. of Prince Edward Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Keith v. VolpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Berssenbrugge v. Luce Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1939
- Poindexter v. Louisiana Financial Assistance CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1968
- Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona & Its Corporate Chapter, Arizona Women's Clinic, Inc. v. NeelyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hassoun v. CimminoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Planned Parenthood Of Southern Arizona v. Barbara LawallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- The Ass'n of Apartment Owners of Guam Yamanoi Condo. v. Guam Yamanoi, Inc.Superior Court of Guam · 2024