Legal Opinion

Schoen v. University of Oregon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 27, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

This is a petition by the University of Oregon (petitioner) for judicial review of a ruling by the Public Employe Relations Board (PERB) that Kathleen Sehoen (respondent), an employe of the University, was eligible to be considered for a one-step salary increase as of October 1,1973.

The central issue presented is the construction of a regulation of the state Personnel Division (Personnel Rule 33-120) which provides that new employes in the classified service who perform adequately are eligible to be considered for a one-step raise at the end of six months. ① There is no statute covering the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sunshine Dairy v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Belleville v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Whitney v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. Local 1724B, American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. State Tax CommissionOregon Tax Court · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fors v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. State v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Buena Dairy Associates v. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Department of Environmental Quality v. Hayworth Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API