Legal Opinion

Humphrey v. Polski

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 21, 1924No. 24,069PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for judgment against the garnishee upon its disclosure.

It appears from the files that plaintiff recovered a verdict against defendant as damages for injuries received through defendant’s negligent operation of an automobile. The disclosure reveals that the garnishee had issued its policy of insurance indemnifying defendant for loss growing out of the operation of the automobile, which policy contains this provision: “This contract does not cover loss resulting or arising from any of the following causes, or while said automobile is being used…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Patterson v. AdanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Tozer v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Mason-Henry Press v. . &198tna L. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Miller v. Union Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  5. Mann v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Basta v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Oehme v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. McCann v. Iowa Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  4. Bettinger v. Northwestern Nat. Cas. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  5. Giacomo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API